Soccer Bank Builder Review: Introduction

Written by Laura Turner

Soccer Bank Builder review

Over the course of nine months, Soccer Bank Builder claims to have turned a £100 bank into £926 with just one bet per day.

The service is very simple, with a bet emailed out each day along with a variety of bookmakers or betting exchanges that can be used to place it.

The system implements a simple staking plan, recalculating the stake each day so that stakes only increase as your bank grows.

There's no recovery style staking plan involved with it.

The bets are all short-priced favourites, mostly in the match odds or double chance markets. There is a full set of past results available to download on the website.

Although the results look impressive, I am approaching this review with caution, as always! I will test the service out for myself to see if I can achieve similar results.

I will post an update of my results here on a monthly basis, but in the meantime you can try it out for free here.

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Laura Turner

About Laura

I have been running the 'Betting System Review' part of Goal Profits since 2015. I carry out fully independent reviews of betting and trading systems, tracking results and giving my honest feedback.

Here are some betting systems and services that earned a Pass rating when I reviewed them:

During my Profit Maximiser review, I banked £391.12 profit and it couldn’t have been any easier! Find out how I made money from sports & casino promotions here.

Read More

During my Winning Footy Tips review, I was achieved a fantastic set of results, with 33.01 points profit with and an amazing 45.8% ROI. It was an easy pass!

Read More

During my Bet Hero review, I was able to uncover tons of markets where bookmakers have mispriced the odds and was able to make £866.97 profit at an ROI of 8.56%.

Read More
Goal Profits

Are you ready to learn how profitable football trading works, generate a second income, or simply improve on past returns?

>